Blogroll

Archives

Exploding Fallacies

Friday, August 24, 2007


So I was mindlessly surfing the interwebs when I stumble across a blog entry detailing a woman's ordeals when she found porn on her boyfriend's computer. This is of course quite humerous, not to mention chocked full of bullshit which I intend to illustrate and laugh at.

He too, admitted a few things. He said he is at heart traditional—his favorite position is missionary. He said he feels completely fulfilled. He said to him, when we have sex he sees me and us and our relationship as part of the act and because of that it is a deep emotional experience for him


He is not at heart traditional, few people really are. Most have at least one off-kilter fetish that they would like to indulge in but for one reason or another do not. Some like pain games, others like water games, and then there are your relatively normal folks who just want to see their partner dressed up in some costume before they get down to it. The point is that nobody is this plain vanilla that all they want is normal heterosexual intercourse in one single position with no accessories or props.

Completely fulfilled would entail getting exactly what he wants, and if he is continuing till she climaxes then hes not. By nature men are designed to spread their seed, and thus we aren't supposed to spend hours on sex but rather get it done as quickly and efficiently as possible. Once done generally we like to either have a smoke, drink something and then fall asleep unless we have pressing obligations outside the bedroom. Straight men are NOT into deep emotional experiences where sex is concerned, we want to get ours and then pass the hell out. Men who claim these things tend not to be men at all but sexually confused women who has the misfortune of being given the wrong chromosome during their stay in the hotel uterus.

The comments section following up the blog has some real great gems as well, such as this one:

Porn is adictive, which is why many men who don't fit the category above nevertheless can't quit. If you don't think you're addicted try doing without it for a month or two.


Wrong again buck-o! Porn is porn, it exists to fill a need which obviously the viewer's partner cannot or will not. Its no more addictive than a ham sandwich (which while good does get old after a while). I contend that porn is the intelligent man's choice of stimulus; once you have seen the games and gimmicks that women pull you find porn to be a perfect alternative to a nagging, complaining, insecure and vindictive woman. Porn wont bitch at you for leaving the toilet seat up, for coming home late from poker night, etc.

Please be careful my dear. online and the persona he has online may be a sign of a Sexaholic. If your relationship is healthy, then the try some porn to enhance, teach, and more.But if he gets up at odd times and uses the computer for private surfing then take caution. I have said enough for now.


ZOMG! he uses the computer at weird hours! I hope this commenter never decides to date a geek or IT professional. Some times your laying there in bed thinking about a programing problem that has been haunting you all day and suddenly the fix just pops into your head, the only logical choice is to jump the hell up and go write it out at least in notepad if not in the compiler as soon as possible before you forget it. Or maybe he is checking his auctions on Ebay or even World of Warcraft. Maybe hes actually being thoughtful for once and checking on a gift that he ordered for you, but now you want to accuse him of being some bullshit sexoholic!

It's just unsettling that he looks at other women when I'm less than 30 feet away, sleeping, but I guess that's beyond my point.


Do you want him to wake you up for sex at whatever hour it is, which you will promptly shoot down because you are 'le tired' or otherwise annoyed that his primary function in life is calling at such an hour? Take you pick; he can either wake you up to satisfy his needs, browse over to his favorite TGP or video clip site and rub one out, or take a trip across town at 2 in the morning to bang an ex because you gave him a rash of shit about surfing porn or waking you up for some midnight action.

Porn can destroy your relationship. My husbands porn went from movies and mags to strip clubs and internet searches for VERY disturbing things. I've been married 20 years, got married at age 18. I started out watching them with him, thinking I was being a prude but it didn't help. All that did was encourage and enable him. At one point, he was asking me to participate in making some of his fantasies real. Which I did not!


From reading this one I get the impression that she was just disgusted by the idea of oral sex, or maybe trying anal, perhaps a little smacking of the butt or whatever else her man was into. The fact that she didn't illustrate even in vague terms what his fetish was hints that it probably wasn't that bad but she was just too rigid to budge on her stance of being a frigid prude. Heavens forbid he actually wants you to take part in the fantasy; forget the fact that hes actually sharing it with you thus showing a level of trust and that he wants YOU to be a part of it and not the cashier of the local convenience store. Yet again women prove my point that porn by itself is far superior to them because porn doesn't guilt trip you, drag you through the mud and try to make you feel lower than whale shit.

I must add that I was pleased to see other men chime in to this blog entry with comments basically telling the author how full of shit she was, because thats how it is. Its just a shame more men wont stand up and call it like they see it.

posted by dword at 9:55 AM | Permalink |

[ back home ]

Comments for Exploding Fallacies

man, i try not to comment on your post that i dont agree with, but this time i need to let it be known, that it has been quite a while since ive read such a ridiculous thing. i think you should be weary of acting as the victim of all womanhood while you are the only one doing the attacking. while that is a tried and true method of dealing with a perceived enemy, it also tends to tip your cards. check your history books and current events on that one.

I personally have no issue with porn, in fact, its a perfectly useful aid in masturbation, which most people with common sense know, is a completely natural act. obviously this woman is limited in her understanding in sexuality, an affliction that typically happens when you marry right out of high school.

im completely caught off guard by your assessment of sex between a man and a woman for multiple reasons. first being that the natural thing for a man to do is put it in and pull it out and be done. that my be considered a preferred method in the wild, in times of survival of a species, but its fairly evident that in modern times involving higher beings, sex can be considered a recreation between people, which in its self isnt natural. with every recreational activity, people vary in what they prefer. some would rather stroll around the block, some want to climb a mountain. its rather odd to suggest that wanting a girl heaving and screaming between your legs when you cum rather then barely wet and started is in its own way unnatural. i consider it greatly satisfying myself.

second, its almost laughable that you think that emotional connections cannot be achieved by "straight males", considering that it not only implies that gay males have a different physical makeup than straight males, but suggest a certain retardation of straight males abilities to connect in any way with anyone. if you say that such an emotional switch does not exist in the case of sex, an instant when you are as close as you can be to someone, its only logical then to say that switch doesnt exist at all, and that all connections with friends and family you have or have had are trivial to you, meaning nothing. i for one am offended by such an assertion. oh, the bit about attacking a mans masculinity in cases of emotional connection, pure bill oreilly.

i think its fair to say that this womans blog is a reflection of how she cant relate to her husband, be it either that she cant match his libido and sexual fantasies, or that hes to lazy or unmotivated to satisfy his wife, opting for the easier, though typically less satisfying act of beating off, or it could just be that there is no attraction there. i can see in no way how it is proof that shooting a wad in your hand is preferable to being straddled by a woman. if anything it shows that maybe these two should give it up, go out, find someone more compatible, and get laid.

note: this retort is a cut down version of what i originally wrote. not all points were argued here.
 

Finally someone replies to something I write, I figured if I indulged in writing what I really wanted to instead of the usual shit that people push out in blogs that someone would feel inclined to respond, guess I was right on that.

Perhaps if you have the full response saved you can post it, because I would most definitely like to read it in its entirety.

And to begin the long (and probably slow) process of responding to this series of retorts I would like to state that I was working with the idea of the heterosexual male not because of some misconception about homosexual males but because I write from what I know of something, thus I write from the side of the heterosexual male, if I was bi or gay then I could possibly cover the other sides of things but as it stands I am neither of those therefore I work with what I know.
 

This post shows what an asshat Syini666 really is.